<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 04-04-26</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/04-04-26/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/04-04-26/</link>
	<description>Promoting Science and Critical Thinking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:58:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/04-04-26/#comment-1333</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/?p=664#comment-1333</guid>
		<description>...someone has a chip on their shouder...still trying to convice yourself the fables are true...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;someone has a chip on their shouder&#8230;still trying to convice yourself the fables are true&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J'Carlin</title>
		<link>http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/04-04-26/#comment-1248</link>
		<dc:creator>J'Carlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 16:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/?p=664#comment-1248</guid>
		<description>Polemics are not literature.  If Dawkins could somehow get the brain fart of &quot;The God Delusion&quot; out of his bibliography he might have a chance.  Unfortunately it is stinking up his name if not the excellent work he has done in explaining a difficult science to a skeptical world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Polemics are not literature.  If Dawkins could somehow get the brain fart of &#8220;The God Delusion&#8221; out of his bibliography he might have a chance.  Unfortunately it is stinking up his name if not the excellent work he has done in explaining a difficult science to a skeptical world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

