<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 07-12-19</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/07-12-19/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/07-12-19/</link>
	<description>Promoting Science and Critical Thinking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:58:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anita</title>
		<link>http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/07-12-19/#comment-830</link>
		<dc:creator>Anita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skeptic.com/eSkeptic/?p=231#comment-830</guid>
		<description>Sorry, you&#039;re absolutely right. I retract.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, you&#8217;re absolutely right. I retract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/07-12-19/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skeptic.com/eSkeptic/?p=231#comment-828</guid>
		<description>@Anita: He&#039;s subtracted four, so if he didn&#039;t mod 10 that could produce a negative number.

Nice essay.  The part beginning with &quot;Each in its own way — literary theory, cultural studies, cultural anthropology, women’s studies, ethnic studies, and a long-standing Marxisant approach to sociology — joined the tacit alliance of antiscientific intellectuals...&quot;  Gets a bit broad and runs into its own anti-anti-scientific tantrum without much to back it up.  That&#039;s a lot of ground to cover in one sentence without a footnote or two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anita: He&#8217;s subtracted four, so if he didn&#8217;t mod 10 that could produce a negative number.</p>
<p>Nice essay.  The part beginning with &#8220;Each in its own way — literary theory, cultural studies, cultural anthropology, women’s studies, ethnic studies, and a long-standing Marxisant approach to sociology — joined the tacit alliance of antiscientific intellectuals&#8230;&#8221;  Gets a bit broad and runs into its own anti-anti-scientific tantrum without much to back it up.  That&#8217;s a lot of ground to cover in one sentence without a footnote or two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anita</title>
		<link>http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/07-12-19/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>Anita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skeptic.com/eSkeptic/?p=231#comment-827</guid>
		<description>I have only one complaint, and that is that if you&#039;re taking the (p_n)th digit in a decimal expansion, you don&#039;t need to use mod 10.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have only one complaint, and that is that if you&#8217;re taking the (p_n)th digit in a decimal expansion, you don&#8217;t need to use mod 10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

