Comments on: 09-12-09 http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/09-12-09/ Promoting Science and Critical Thinking Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:04:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Loughlin Tatem http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/09-12-09/#comment-4097 Loughlin Tatem Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:51:07 +0000 http://www.skeptic.com/?p=1837#comment-4097 Yes, but we should not just slip in an answer. Yes, but we should not just slip in an answer.

]]> By: gratis cat http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/09-12-09/#comment-980 gratis cat Mon, 14 Dec 2009 03:51:47 +0000 http://www.skeptic.com/?p=1837#comment-980 From Britney Spears to Kanye West, here are the top 3 celebrities that have been pranked using Twitter. <a href="http://www.zug.com/live/83216/Top-3-Celebrity-Twitter-Pranks.html" rel="nofollow"> Top 3 Celebrity Twitter Pranks </a> From Britney Spears to Kanye West, here are the top 3 celebrities that have been pranked using Twitter. Top 3 Celebrity Twitter Pranks

]]> By: webmaster http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/09-12-09/#comment-972 webmaster Wed, 09 Dec 2009 20:03:43 +0000 http://www.skeptic.com/?p=1837#comment-972 Thank you for your inquiry. Unfortunately, there is no way for us to obtain a commission on a completed Amazon order that didn't involve our affiliate link in the process. However, feel free to start your shopping from <a href="http://www.skeptic.com/get_involved/affiliate_links.html" rel="nofollow">our affiliate links</a> in the future, and we will get a commission. You can follow the simple bookmarking instructions so you don't always have to refer back to that page. Thank you for your inquiry. Unfortunately, there is no way for us to obtain a commission on a completed Amazon order that didn’t involve our affiliate link in the process. However, feel free to start your shopping from our affiliate links in the future, and we will get a commission. You can follow the simple bookmarking instructions so you don’t always have to refer back to that page.

]]> By: jackson moon http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/09-12-09/#comment-971 jackson moon Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:08:32 +0000 http://www.skeptic.com/?p=1837#comment-971 Skeptical is good. Weighing and considering is good. They clear away the mental noise from the signal. I am firmly in an evolutionary mind set because of what I see in the strata of rocks everyday. BUT, a vital question in this scenario is: OK OK OK lets talk evolution - from what? As far as I can tell the "elements" always "know" how to assemble themselves into a hydrogen atom (as well as the much more complex other "elements"). Creation or evolution - the hydrogen atoms don't care -but they always form the same way! YEOW! If this is chance selection by natural selection it seems odd that the same series occurs everywhere without prompting or aid from the Federal Government. Were the "rules" inherent in them before the alleged "big bang" ? That is, before they existed, were their future identities inherent in the "stuff" that contained everything? Perhaps the LHC will discover something. Oh of course it will discover something. My dime is on the data containing data that contains data that contains data that may take millenia to percolate into the man in the streets consciousness. Skeptical is good.

Weighing and considering is good.

They clear away the mental noise from the signal.

I am firmly in an evolutionary mind set because of what I see in the strata of rocks everyday.

BUT, a vital question in this scenario is: OK OK OK lets talk evolution – from what?

As far as I can tell the “elements” always “know” how to assemble themselves into a hydrogen atom (as well as the much more complex other “elements”). Creation or evolution – the hydrogen atoms don’t care -but they always form the same way!

YEOW! If this is chance selection by natural selection it seems odd that the same series occurs everywhere without prompting or aid from the Federal Government.

Were the “rules” inherent in them before the alleged “big bang” ? That is, before they existed, were their future identities inherent in the “stuff” that contained everything?

Perhaps the LHC will discover something. Oh of course it will discover something.

My dime is on the data containing data that contains data that contains data that may take millenia to percolate into the man in the streets consciousness.

]]> By: Aarmin Banaji http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/09-12-09/#comment-969 Aarmin Banaji Wed, 09 Dec 2009 11:23:39 +0000 http://www.skeptic.com/?p=1837#comment-969 It is only in this issue, that I observed I could have made a contribution to the Skeptics Society when I completed an order on Amazon. Is it too late for Amazon to pass on the commission, if I let you have the details? The order was placed on 24th November 2009. And it has been fully executed. It is only in this issue, that I observed I could have made a contribution to the Skeptics Society when I completed an order on Amazon.

Is it too late for Amazon to pass on the commission, if I let you have the details?

The order was placed on 24th November 2009. And it has been fully executed.

]]>