Skeptic » Insight » The Forgetfulness of Skepticism

The Skeptics Society & Skeptic magazine


banner

The Forgetfulness of Skepticism

Posted on Dec. 17, 2014 by | Comments (1)
Rinn-A1-510px

Skeptic Joseph Rinn, demonstrating mediumistic trickery for a press syndicate in 1920. (From Daniel Loxton’s collection.)

Scientific skepticism has a long history—roughly 40 years in its most modern organized form, and centuries (arguably millennia) as a more or less recognizable tradition. (See my “Why Is There a Skeptical Movement?” for a discussion of this lengthy intellectual thread—PDF.)

We’ve learned a lot in that time. Generations of skeptics have devoted themselves to understanding paranormal and pseudoscientific claims, beliefs, and impostures. But even with those efforts, the fringe has remained radically under-examinded. Because this realm is so vast while the scholars and activists interested in exploring it are so few, our work has often had something of a scrambling quality. In our rush, skeptics have tended to neglect, or at least to set aside for some future time, some of the improvements of better-established fields.

Academics take it for granted that the ever-evolving practice of medicine should be weighed and considered by an ancillary scholarly field of medical ethics. By contrast, ethical conversations in skepticism tend to be ad hoc afterthoughts (and frequently much contested). Many such reflective disciplines exist for other fields, from art history to the philosophy of science. There are academic journals dedicated not only to the history of science as a broad umbrella, but also specifically to the history of psychology, geology, medicine, astronomy, and so on. For our part, skeptics are left to preserve, study, and remember the lessons of our own history as best we can as we go along. With so many other urgent triage priorities, the truth is that we tend not to remember very well.

This forgetfulness seems sad to me on an existential level. I’d prefer that those who fought these battles before us, from Rose Mackenberg to Joseph Rinn, be honored for having having once stood as the man in the arena (as Teddy Roosevelt so memorably described those who spend themselves “in a worthy cause”1). But of course there are also practical benefits to the study of the work of the past.

Among those benefits is context. It’s easy for skeptics to fall prey to a sort of exceptionalism of the present. Skeptics sometimes feel that we live in a moment in which pseudoscience poses an unparalleled threat (perhaps a “rising tide of irrationality”) to be met with a uniquely new kind of science-based understanding of how thinking goes wrong. Astronomer and skeptic Carl Sagan had little patience for the paranoid (and for skeptics, oddly self-aggrandizing) idea that “there’s an explosion of ignorance today,” saying in 1994,

No, I think we’ve always been like that. We had demons from ancient Greece, gods who came down and mated with humans, incubi and succubi in the Middle Ages who sexually abused people while they were sleeping. We had fairies. And now we have aliens. To me, it all seems very similar.2

Taking up this topic again two years later, Sagan emphasized, “This is an endemic human characteristic—to be credulous, to believe what others tell us, to prefer what feels good to what’s true.” The difference between the credulities of our own time and those of the past is simply the scale and power with which modern humanity can express them:

The dangers of not thinking clearly are much greater now than ever before. It’s not that there’s something new in our way of thinking, it’s that credulous and confused thinking can be much more lethal in ways it was never before.3

Just as confusion and superstition are as old as humanity, so too is the impulse to illuminate the darker corners of our world—and of our minds. As I’ve discussed elsewhere, “For as long as there have been claims that sound too good to be true, there have been people who felt drawn to the task of finding out.”

In my next post I will share a selection of quotes in which modern-seeming concepts that are frequently employed by skeptics today—placebos, ideomotor effects, expectant attention, and inattentional blindness—are discussed in passages written over a century ago.

I’ll ask you to gaze into those passages for a few moments, like reflecting pools, and consider that the conceptual tools for skeptical examination of paranormal claims have in many ways changed little more than the nature of imposture and superstition.

References
  1. Theodore Roosevelt. “Citizenship in a Republic” (a speech delivered at the Sorbonne in Paris, April 23, 1910).
  2. Carl Sagan, as quoted in Conversations with Carl Sagan. Tom Head, Ed. (Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2006.) p. 101 (reprinting an interview originally published in Anne Kalosh, “Bringing Science Down to Earth.” Hemispheres, October 1994)
  3. Ibid p. 114 (reprinting an interview originally published in Psychology Today, Jan/Feb 1996)
Daniel Loxton

Daniel Loxton is the Editor of INSIGHT at Skeptic.com and of Junior Skeptic, the 10-page kids’ science section bound within Skeptic magazine. Daniel has been an avid follower of the paranormal literature since childhood, and of the skeptical literature since his youth. He is also an award-winning author. Read Daniel’s full bio or his other posts on this blog.

One Comment

  1. Rick Hendershot says:

    I think you are conflating two different points here, suggesting that one is to some extent the cause of the other. On the one hand, you say the work of skeptics “…has often had something of a scrambling quality” because (as I understand your point) there is no concentrated “discipline” to which skeptics belong. This, I think you are suggesting, leads to forgetfulness.

    Fair enough on the second point. We are all victims of forgetfulness no matter how immersed we are in the task of the moment.

    But I doubt this is because there is no dedicated “discipline”. I get the impression there are lots of skeptical voices both within specific disciplines and ancillary to them, but much too much time wasted by publications like this one on things like ghosts, paranormal, psychics, aliens, etc. In my estimation these are not worth serious consideration, skeptical or otherwise.

    In other words, I think the problem is a lack of focus. As you say, “…this realm is so vast while the scholars and activists interested in exploring it are so few.” So why waste time on the stuff of cable TV?

Patreon: a new way to support the things skeptic creates

Get eSkeptic

Science in your inbox every Wednesday!

eSkeptic delivers great articles, videos, podcasts, reviews, event announcements, and more to your inbox once a week.

Sign me up!

Donate to Skeptic

Please support the work of the Skeptics Society. Make the world a more rational place and help us defend the role of science in society.

Detecting Baloney

Baloney Detection Kit Sandwich (Infographic) by Deanna and Skylar (High Tech High Media Arts, San Diego, CA)

The Baloney Detection Kit Sandwich (Infographic)

For a class project, a pair of 11th grade physics students created the infographic shown below, inspired by Michael Shermer’s Baloney Detection Kit: a 16-page booklet designed to hone your critical thinking skills.

FREE Video Series

Science Based Medicine vs. Alternative Medicine

Science Based Medicine vs. Alternative Medicine

Understanding the difference could save your life! In this superb 10-part video lecture series, Harriet Hall, M.D., contrasts science-based medicine with so-called “complementary and alternative” methods. The lectures each range from 32 to 45 minutes.

FREE PDF Download

Top 10 Myths of Terrorism

Is Terrorism an Existential Threat?

This free booklet reveals 10 myths that explain why terrorism is not a threat to our way of life or our survival.

FREE PDF Download

The Top 10 Weirdest Things

The Top Ten Strangest Beliefs

Michael Shermer has compiled a list of the top 10 strangest beliefs that he has encountered in his quarter century as a professional skeptic.

FREE PDF Download

Reality Check: How Science Deniers Threaten Our Future (paperback cover)

Who believes them? Why? How can you tell if they’re true?

What is a conspiracy theory, why do people believe in them, and why do they tend to proliferate? Why does belief in one conspiracy correlate to belief in others? What are the triggers of belief, and how does group identity factor into it? How can one tell the difference between a true conspiracy and a false one?

FREE PDF Download

The Science Behind Why People See Ghosts

The Science Behind Why People See Ghosts

Do you know someone who has had a mind altering experience? If so, you know how compelling they can be. They are one of the foundations of widespread belief in the paranormal. But as skeptics are well aware, accepting them as reality can be dangerous…

FREE PDF Download

Top 10 Myths About Evolution

Top 10 Myths About Evolution (and how we know it really happened)

If humans came from apes, why aren’t apes evolving into humans? Find out in this pamphlet!

FREE PDF Download

Learn to be a Psychic in 10 Easy Lessons

Learn to do Psychic “Cold Reading” in 10
Easy Lessons

Psychic readings and fortunetelling are an ancient art — a combination of acting and psychological manipulation.

Copyright © 1992–2017. All rights reserved. The Skeptics Society | P.O. Box 338 | Altadena, CA, 91001 | 1-626-794-3119. Privacy Policy.